• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Work With Me
  • Research
  • Studio
  • Contact

Is Non-Evidence-Based Clinical Practice An Ethical Dilemma?

Monday, 03 October 2011 22:03

A surgery clinic in Greenwich, London.Evidence-based clinical practice consists of the use of assessment strategies and treatment interventions that have scientific evidence to support their use. The harsh reality is that although there are a myriad of hypothetical constructs underlying many assessment strategies and treatment interventions, many (if not most) of these are not yet supported by both the physiology literature (on the cellular level) and the clinical literature (on the applied level).

On a daily basis, clinicians are faced with a significant clinical and ethical decision: to utilize evidence-based clinical approaches, or not. Is non-evidence-based practice not only a clinical issue, but a broader ethical issue as well?

Medical ethics are a cornerstone of professional behaviors. Many professional associations have ethics statements for their members. For example, the American Medical Association’s Code Of Medical Ethics notes that

“A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care … A physician shall continue to study, apply, and advance scientific knowledge … A physician shall, while caring for a patient, regard responsibility to the patient as paramount.”

Add to this the words of the Hippocratic Oath, which state

“First, do no harm. Second, revere the healing powers of nature”.

The American Physical Therapy Association also has a Code of Ethics for its’ members that includes the following passages:

“Physical therapists shall demonstrate independent and objective professional judgment in the patient’s/client’s best interest in all practice settings … Physical therapists shall demonstrate professional judgment informed by professional standards, evidence (including current literature and established best practice), practitioner experience, and patient/client values”.

It is obvious that evidence-based practice is an important aspect of these two professional associations’ codes of ethics. I would assume that most health care providers have a similar ethical code.

But compare these Codes to the basic principles of medical ethics to find the incongruities. There are four primary principles that provide a foundation: respect for autonomy (“informed consent”), nonmaleficence (“first, do no harm”), beneficence (“taking actions that serve the best interests of the patient”), and justice (“giving to each that which is his due”). Non-evidence-based practice involves the utilization of assessment and treatment strategies that have little to no scientific support. My question is this: if you know that evidence does not exist for a treatment, is it unethical to apply that treatment to a patient? Can you knowingly provide a treatment that has little to no effect on the patient, and do so within the code of ethics of your health care profession?

It would appear that non-evidence-based practice suffers from an inability to either confirm or refute nonmalificence. How do we know that this treatment doesn’t cause harm? Worse yet, and perhaps more important, non-evidence-based practice suffers from an inability to confirm or refute beneficence. How can we truly stand by the statement that the treatment is serving the best interests of the patient when there is no evidence to substantiate it?

If efficacy isn’t a good enough reason to pursue evidence-based practice, then perhaps the ethics of the issue should provide an even greater need to pursue it. As clinicians, it is our ethical and clinical responsibility to do so – for the benefit of the patient, and for our own professional integrity.

Photo credits: Wikipedia

Related articles
  • The Smart Life Project (allanbesselink.com)
  • Finding Voodoo In The Middle Of The Road (allanbesselink.com)
  • Reflections On Voodoo And Physical Therapy (allanbesselink.com)
alt

Subscribe To My Newsletter

I'll share my latest thoughts, ideas, blog posts, and content with you every two weeks! It's free and it's 100% spam-free. How cool is that? What more can you ask for?

Subscribe Now

Besselink Project

  • Smart Sport
  • Smart Physio
  • RunSmart
  • RiffSmart
  • P1 Project
  • Innovanated

BP Manifestos

  • Smart Health Revolution
  • Vision Now

Breaking News

  • Life Through The Lens Of My OM-10
  • Superpowers, Stories, And Social Change
  • Social Media Didn't Fail Us - We Failed Us
  • Critical Thinking And The Bermuda Triangle
  • Should Normal Have Ever Been Normal?

Most Popular Posts

  • The Deafening Silence
  • Evolution Or Revolution?
  • Learning How To Live
  • Patient Access To Physical Therapy And Groundhog Day
  • The Homeostasis Of Writing
  • McKenzie’s Derangement Syndrome In A World Of Pathoanatomy
  • Three Common Examples Of Self Image, Self Sabotage, And Comfort Zones In Action
  • Why HB 1263 Matters
  • The Flow Of Running, The Flow Of Life
  • One Nation – Under Gold
  • A Pause For Many A Cause
  • Civil Rights And Your Health
  • Own, Disrupt, Transform–Or Else?
  • Is Non-Evidence-Based Clinical Practice An Ethical Dilemma?
  • The APTA’s Vision 2020: My 12 Year Report Card
  • Think Big, Act Big
  • The Paradox That Is World Cup Soccer
  • Generation Z And Obesity
  • Your Own Worst Enemy
  • Direct Access To Physical Therapy: You Have It, Or You Don’t

Allan Besselink

Allan Besselink, PT, DPT, Dip.MDTAllan Besselink, PT, DPT, Ph.D., Dip.MDT has a unique voice in the world of sport, education, and health care, one that has been defined by his experiences as physiotherapist, mentor, McKenzie practitioner, innovator, author, educator, coach, patient, and athlete. Read more about Allan, contact him, get updates via email, or connect with him on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

RunSmart Book

Where To Buy RunSmartUp to 60% of runners will sustain an injury within any given year. Poor running mechanics, in conjunction with poor, ineffective and outdated training methods, can pose a significant injury risk. "RunSmart" was written to address these issues in the running community.

Featured Chapter

Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation "Running Injuries: Etiology And Recovery- Based Treatment" (co-author Bridget Clark, PT) appears in the third edition and fourth editions of "Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Team Approach" by Charles Giangarra, MD and Robert C. Manske, PT.

PT Blog Awards

Top 5 finalist in three categories: "Best Overall Blog", "Best PT Blog" and "Best Advocacy Blog".

Copyright 2006-2022 Allan Besselink  | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy |  Disclosure Policy |  FAQ

Powered By Mobius Intermedia