• Home
  • About
  • Besselink Project
  • Academia
  • Studio
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Testimonials
  • Work With Me

The Day That McKenzie Challenged My Beliefs

Wednesday, 26 September 2012 23:08

Eglinton Valley  - RoadIt is a day that stands out in infamy for me. The year was 1994. It is a day that changed my life in any number of ways.

The day in question was day one of a four day course in the McKenzie Method. Yes, I will be the first to admit that it sounds a little corny, all this life-changing stuff. But in hindsight, it really isn’t that far from the truth.

On that particular day, I faced a challenge that all clinicians will face. I sat in a room full of my peers while an instructor, through no fault of his own, stood in front of a classroom and challenged every belief I had about my clinical practice patterns and the beliefs I was maintaining about the whole lot.

At the end of the day, it came down to a simple choice.

I really hadn’t wanted to even go to this course. My employer at the time demanded that I attend two McKenzie courses - Parts A and B. They were to be held in Corpus Christi, a coastal city about 200 miles from Austin. At that point in my young career, I thought I had already learned “that stuff” in university.

Ignorance is bliss.

I begrudgingly went to Corpus Christi and sat through day one. It was like a stack of research had been thrown onto a table with a resounding “thud”. The material was counter to what I had been taught. It was counter to the foundations upon which I had built 6 years of clinical practice. As the day progressed, it was becoming easier to feel defensive about the whole thing. This was challenging my beliefs – and making me very uncomfortable in the process.

Then there was “the question”. It was a question that struck to the heart, the core, of my being.

If I truly believed in the scientific method, and if I truly believed in being the best PT that I can be, then I had to put my beliefs aside (as much as possible) and listen. And read. And digest. And then I could make an informed decision, weighing out the evidence as a good scientist would do.

And the rest, as they say, is history. A short four years after that day, I had attained the highest level of training in the McKenzie Method. That was in 1998.

It is a story that I recount fondly. Why? Sure, the material that I learned – the approach to patient care – has had a huge impact on my career path and on how I view clinical reasoning and patient management. But that isn’t the most important lesson learned on that day in 1994.

In that one moment, I could see how my beliefs were getting in the way of the scientific method – good evidence and sound logic, or otherwise. It was one of the first times that I realized the impact of our belief systems on clinical practice, sometimes having far more impact than the actual evidence.

Lo and behold, I have found many instances through the years that evoke that same guttural, belief-defensive sensation. Take politics and religion as but two examples! Much as I have come to realize, in my profession and in my world, the science and the evidence isn’t what triggers emotional debate – it is our beliefs about the evidence that does. The sooner we understand that and appreciate it for what it is, the easier it is to have a constructive debate to find real solutions. Maybe the best solutions lie at the junction of discomfort and discovery.

It was a challenging and disconcerting day. But in hindsight, it was a catalyst for growth – and taught me some valuable life lessons in the process.

Photo credits: zensei8

Related Articles By Allan Besselink
  • McKenzie Practitioner And Patient Advocacy
  • Five Ways That MDT Will Change Orthopedics
  • Clinical Reasoning: When Beliefs Trump Evidence

RunSmart Book

Where To Buy RunSmartUp to 60% of runners will sustain an injury within any given year. Poor running mechanics, in conjunction with poor, ineffective and outdated training methods, can pose a significant injury risk. "RunSmart" was written to address these issues in the running community.

Featured Chapter

Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation "Running Injuries: Etiology And Recovery- Based Treatment" (co-author Bridget Clark, PT) appears in the third edition and fourth editions of "Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Team Approach" by Charles Giangarra, MD and Robert C. Manske, PT.

Subscribe Now!

BP Manifestos

  • Smart Health Revolution
  • Vision Now

Most Popular Posts

  • The Deafening Silence
  • Evolution Or Revolution?
  • Three Common Examples Of Self Image, Self Sabotage, And Comfort Zones In Action
  • Patient Access To Physical Therapy And Groundhog Day
  • Learning How To Live
  • The Homeostasis Of Writing
  • Why HB 1263 Matters
  • The Flow Of Running, The Flow Of Life

Subscribe To My Newsletter

Allan Besselink

Allan Besselink, PT, DPT, Dip.MDTAllan Besselink, PT, DPT, Ph.D., Dip.MDT has a unique voice in the world of sports, education, and health care. Read more about Allan here.

PT Blog Awards

Top 5 finalist in three categories: "Best Overall Blog", "Best PT Blog" and "Best Advocacy Blog".

Connect With Me

PO Box 26161
Austin, TX 78755
512-222-6263

         

Copyright 2006-2023 Allan Besselink  | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy |  Disclosure Policy |  FAQ

Powered By Mobius Intermedia