• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • SMART
  • RunSmart
  • Podcast
  • Innovanated
  • Mobius
  • FAQ
  • Contact

When Scientific Evidence Is Ignored, Everyone Suffers

Tuesday, 02 April 2013 22:18

data (scrabble)Evidence and data are both an integral part of the scientific method - or so I thought. Here I was thinking that logic should provide a foundation for clinical reasoning and critical thinking. Crazy me.

If you are going through the effort and the expense (both in time and dollars) to collect data and accrue evidence, then wouldn't the next step be to utilize it?

Not if the evidence contradicts your current beliefs. Then you have a mess on your hands.

Evidence is ignored on a regular basis. And for a variety of reasons - none of which are positive in the long term.

This happens for a variety of reasons. Typically, the inciting force is a disparity between the evidence and the currently-held beliefs and "accepted standards". The bigger the disparity, the greater the challenge to integrate the data - and the greater emotional resistance to not do so.

It can be ignored because of personal or community beliefs, political agendas, professional turf battles ... you name it. Even the best, most compelling evidence can be ignored. Why? Because it requires us to acknowledge the limitations of what we currently know (and believe). Evidence forces us to hold ourselves accountable to science. And sometimes we just don't want to do that for reasons unrelated to the evidence itself.

Evidence is not about being "right" or "wrong". It is not about ego defense. It is not about power. Or at least it shouldn't be.

It is what it is. Evidence is about solving problems and finding better solutions than perhaps you would have established without the data.

When the evidence is ignored, you get to experience "spin". You've heard it before - all the varieties of rationalization and camouflage and subversion that spring into action when the evidence gets disconcerting, when the evidence goes counter to our beliefs or our pocketbook.

Here is a fine example:

"We don't know what is best for low back pain".

It's a nice, comfy, non-threatening, open-ended statement. But you know what? We have had some sound scientific evidence for quite some time. However, many just choose to ignore the global reality of clinical guidelines. You can accept that evidence - and integrate it - or ignore the evidence - and keep on applying that TENS machine, and make sure you put a hot pack on top - three times a week for eternity, if you will.

Evidence is solution-oriented. Any time the evidence is ignored, for whatever reason, there cannot be a positive long-term solution. Sure, it might keep you comfortable and economically viable for the short-term. But in the end, everyone suffers for it - in costs, in outcomes, in efficacy.

If you present yourself as one to support the evidence and the values contained within, then don't just pay lip service to it. Use it. Otherwise, save the research dollars, save the discussion and debate and the breath they entail, and just do whatever you want to do. At least your motives will be clear that way.

Photo credits: justgrimes

Related Articles By Allan Besselink
  • Prostate Cancer Screening: The Latest Evidence To Be Ignored?
  • We Don't Need No Stinking Evidence - Or Do We?
  • Do We Have The Evidence?

Free Updates

Join The Smart Life Revolution!

Latest Blog Posts

  • The Enlightenment of 2020
  • Run Towards Or Run Away?
  • Simplicity And Civility
  • Back In The Saddle Again
  • A Pause For Many A Cause

Blog Categories

Smart Physio

posts are on professional and career-related topics such as health, fitness, training, and health care.

Rhubarb Diaries

posts are commentary, perspectives, opinions, humor and insight on all of my favorite topics: music, sport, and politics/current events.

Most Popular Posts

  • The Deafening Silence
  • Evolution Or Revolution?
  • Learning How To Live
  • McKenzie’s Derangement Syndrome In A World Of Pathoanatomy
  • The Homeostasis Of Writing
  • Three Common Examples Of Self Image, Self Sabotage, And Comfort Zones In Action
  • Patient Access To Physical Therapy And Groundhog Day
  • Why HB 1263 Matters
  • The Flow Of Running, The Flow Of Life
  • One Nation – Under Gold

Top 10 Smart Physio

  • The Deafening Silence
  • Evolution Or Revolution?
  • Learning How To Live
  • McKenzie’s Derangement Syndrome In A World Of Pathoanatomy
  • The Homeostasis Of Writing
  • Three Common Examples Of Self Image, Self Sabotage, And Comfort Zones In Action
  • Patient Access To Physical Therapy And Groundhog Day
  • Why HB 1263 Matters
  • The Flow Of Running, The Flow Of Life
  • A Pause For Many A Cause

Top 10 Rhubarb Diaries

  • One Nation – Under Gold
  • The Paradox That Is World Cup Soccer
  • Rhubarb Ruminations: Episode 3
  • Longhorns Update: Missing In Action
  • Rhubarb Ruminations: Episode 2
  • Stay In School - And Work On That Jump Shot
  • The First Amendment And Fanaticism
  • One Small Step For Man … One Huge Step For Thought
  • Rhubarb Ruminations: Episode 5
  • The Tifosi Are Coming! Formula One Heads To Austin

PT Blog Awards

Top 5 finalist in three categories: "Best Overall Blog", "Best PT Blog" and "Best Advocacy Blog".

Official Site

Allan Besselink

Allan Besselink, PT, DPT, Dip.MDTAllan Besselink, PT, DPT, Dip.MDT has a unique voice in the world of sport, education, and health care, one that has been defined by his experiences as physiotherapist, mentor, McKenzie practitioner, innovator, author, educator, coach, patient, and athlete. Read more about Allan, contact him, get updates via email, or connect with him on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

RunSmart Book

Where To Buy RunSmartUp to 60% of runners will sustain an injury within any given year. Poor running mechanics, in conjunction with poor, ineffective and outdated training methods, can pose a significant injury risk. "RunSmart" was written to address these issues in the running community.

Featured Chapter

Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation "Running Injuries: Etiology And Recovery- Based Treatment" (co-author Bridget Clark, PT) appears in the third edition and fourth editions of "Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Team Approach" by Charles Giangarra, MD and Robert C. Manske, PT.

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND License.

Visitors

Copyright 2006-2020 Allan Besselink  | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy |  Disclosure Policy |  FAQ

Powered By Mobius Intermedia